http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jFiCRRxlIfQuGBEsNH7PazHTPxZw

By Ron Bousso – 3 hours ago
RAMAT GAN, Israel (AFP) — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday endorsed for the first time the creation of a Palestinian state, provided it was demilitarised, after weeks of pressure from Washington.
The White House called his speech "an important step forward."
But Netanyahu also said the Palestinians must recognise the Jewish character of Israel, a condition Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas has long rejected.
He also ruled out a halt to all Jewish settlement activity as demanded by the United States.
"If the Palestinians recognise Israel as the state of the Jewish people, then we arrive at a solution based on a demilitarised Palestinian state alongside Israel," Netanyahu said.
"The Palestinian territory will be without arms, will not control airspace, will not be able to have arms enter, without the possibility of striking alliances with Iran or (the Lebanese Shiite militia) Hezbollah."
Netanyahu also ruled out a complete stop to settlement activity in the occupied West Bank -- which the Palestinians have said is a condition for relaunching talks -- and said Palestinian refugees would not be resettled inside Israel's borders.
The Palestinians recognised Israel as a state in 1993 as part of the Oslo accords but have refused to recognise it as "Jewish" because doing so would effectively mean giving up the right of return for Palestinian refugees, a key Palestinian demand since Israel was created in 1948.
The Palestinians quickly slammed Netanyahu's speech, which Abbas spokesman Nabil Abu Rudeina said "torpedoes all peace initiatives in the region."
"It hobbles all efforts to save the peace process, in a clear defiance of the US administration," he told AFP.
The Islamist Hamas movement ruling the Gaza Strip condemned it as reflecting a "racist, extremist" ideology that denied Palestinian rights.
The speech was billed as a response to Obama's address to the Muslim world 10 days ago in which he reiterated Washington's "unbreakable" bond with Israel but also called the Palestinian situation "intolerable."
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement Obama "welcomes the important step forward in Prime Minister Netanyahu's speech."
The US statement reiterated Obama's commitment to a two-state solution, with a Jewish state of Israel and an independent Palestine "in the historic homeland of both peoples."
Obama "believes this solution can and must ensure both Israel's security and the fulfillment of the Palestinians' legitimate aspirations for a viable state, and he welcomes Prime Minister Netanyahu's endorsement of that goal," it said.
In recent weeks Washington had increased pressure on Israel's new government to endorse the idea of a Palestinian state and halt all settlement activity.
The Obama administration's position raised fears in Israel that its main ally may ease its support as it tries to improve relations with the Muslim world.
The US stance put Netanyahu in a difficult position, as his heavily right-wing 10-week-old government could collapse if he gives in to too many of Washington's demands.
"It was a brilliant speech but it had one miserable phrase that laid the cornerstone for the creation of a state of Palestine," Likud MP Danny Danon said following the premier's address.
"I will do everything in my power in parliament to prevent this from happening."
The main settlers' organisation in a statement condemned the speech.
"We deplore that the prime minister has agreed to the creation of a demilitarised Palestinian state after he has said for years that such a state, even demilitarised, would be a threat to Israel," the Yesha Council said.
But Daniel Ben Simon, an MP from the centre-left Labour party, part of Netanyahu's coalition, called it a "revolutionary speech" and said Israel's centrist parties should encourage the hawkish prime minister.
He added that such support could "lead to a miracle of a peace agreement with the Palestinians under a centre-right government, something at which left-wing governments never succeeded."
A Western diplomat speaking on condition of anonymity said the speech "is certainly encouraging and gives us a lot of work with."
"I think everyone understands Israel's concerns and the demand for a demilitarised (Palestinian) state has always been part of the agenda."
Washington provides Israel with 2.4 billion dollars of annual military aid as well as diplomatic support, making the United States its most important ally.
Israel and the Palestinians relaunched their negotiations at a US conference in November 2007, but the talks made little progress and were suspended during Israel's blistering war on Gaza in December and January.
Netanyahu on Sunday also responded to the elections in Iran, saying the "biggest threat to Israel, the Middle East and the entire world is the crossing of a nuclear weapon with radical Islam."
Israel, the region's sole if undeclared nuclear power, has accused Iran of racing to develop atomic weapons under the guise of a civilian nuclear programme, allegations Tehran vehemently denies.
The White House called his speech "an important step forward."
But Netanyahu also said the Palestinians must recognise the Jewish character of Israel, a condition Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas has long rejected.
He also ruled out a halt to all Jewish settlement activity as demanded by the United States.
"If the Palestinians recognise Israel as the state of the Jewish people, then we arrive at a solution based on a demilitarised Palestinian state alongside Israel," Netanyahu said.
"The Palestinian territory will be without arms, will not control airspace, will not be able to have arms enter, without the possibility of striking alliances with Iran or (the Lebanese Shiite militia) Hezbollah."
Netanyahu also ruled out a complete stop to settlement activity in the occupied West Bank -- which the Palestinians have said is a condition for relaunching talks -- and said Palestinian refugees would not be resettled inside Israel's borders.
The Palestinians recognised Israel as a state in 1993 as part of the Oslo accords but have refused to recognise it as "Jewish" because doing so would effectively mean giving up the right of return for Palestinian refugees, a key Palestinian demand since Israel was created in 1948.
The Palestinians quickly slammed Netanyahu's speech, which Abbas spokesman Nabil Abu Rudeina said "torpedoes all peace initiatives in the region."
"It hobbles all efforts to save the peace process, in a clear defiance of the US administration," he told AFP.
The Islamist Hamas movement ruling the Gaza Strip condemned it as reflecting a "racist, extremist" ideology that denied Palestinian rights.
The speech was billed as a response to Obama's address to the Muslim world 10 days ago in which he reiterated Washington's "unbreakable" bond with Israel but also called the Palestinian situation "intolerable."
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement Obama "welcomes the important step forward in Prime Minister Netanyahu's speech."
The US statement reiterated Obama's commitment to a two-state solution, with a Jewish state of Israel and an independent Palestine "in the historic homeland of both peoples."
Obama "believes this solution can and must ensure both Israel's security and the fulfillment of the Palestinians' legitimate aspirations for a viable state, and he welcomes Prime Minister Netanyahu's endorsement of that goal," it said.
In recent weeks Washington had increased pressure on Israel's new government to endorse the idea of a Palestinian state and halt all settlement activity.
The Obama administration's position raised fears in Israel that its main ally may ease its support as it tries to improve relations with the Muslim world.
The US stance put Netanyahu in a difficult position, as his heavily right-wing 10-week-old government could collapse if he gives in to too many of Washington's demands.
"It was a brilliant speech but it had one miserable phrase that laid the cornerstone for the creation of a state of Palestine," Likud MP Danny Danon said following the premier's address.
"I will do everything in my power in parliament to prevent this from happening."
The main settlers' organisation in a statement condemned the speech.
"We deplore that the prime minister has agreed to the creation of a demilitarised Palestinian state after he has said for years that such a state, even demilitarised, would be a threat to Israel," the Yesha Council said.
But Daniel Ben Simon, an MP from the centre-left Labour party, part of Netanyahu's coalition, called it a "revolutionary speech" and said Israel's centrist parties should encourage the hawkish prime minister.
He added that such support could "lead to a miracle of a peace agreement with the Palestinians under a centre-right government, something at which left-wing governments never succeeded."
A Western diplomat speaking on condition of anonymity said the speech "is certainly encouraging and gives us a lot of work with."
"I think everyone understands Israel's concerns and the demand for a demilitarised (Palestinian) state has always been part of the agenda."
Washington provides Israel with 2.4 billion dollars of annual military aid as well as diplomatic support, making the United States its most important ally.
Israel and the Palestinians relaunched their negotiations at a US conference in November 2007, but the talks made little progress and were suspended during Israel's blistering war on Gaza in December and January.
Netanyahu on Sunday also responded to the elections in Iran, saying the "biggest threat to Israel, the Middle East and the entire world is the crossing of a nuclear weapon with radical Islam."
Israel, the region's sole if undeclared nuclear power, has accused Iran of racing to develop atomic weapons under the guise of a civilian nuclear programme, allegations Tehran vehemently denies.
Kind of a "I can have them but you can't have them" thing it seems to me.
AntwortenLöschenJust watching it on the news. I doubt he'll keep his word.
AntwortenLöschenYou are a state but you can't stop our encroachment on your territory. Oh, and you have no control over your own air space. The man is a veritable saint I tell you!
AntwortenLöschenConsidering where he started, that could be considered a small step for Netenyahu, but many more will be needed to get to a point where Palestinians might be expected to think it is fair.
AntwortenLöschenIf it creates a starting point for dialog, and some debate and reconsideration among the Israeli public, perhaps additional movement toward a viable agreement will be started.
I'm hopeful too, especially against the backdrop of what Obama has said recently. Going forward...
AntwortenLöschenOften find myself thinking in terms or Ireland also. Splinter groups of the IRA sprang up, but in general, they disarmed, and that was necessary to create the relative peace they have in Northern Ireland now. Hamas must do likewise.
Much as I would like to see a peaceful solution to that mess, I don't see how the Palestinians can accept the proposal as even a place to start. This situation has one factor Northern Ireland didn't: Protestants and the English were not moving Catholics into refugee camps and seizing their land. Netanyahu specifically said that wasn't going to stop. Can you see any way the IRA would have laid down arms if that were going on in Ireland?
AntwortenLöschenMy sympathy is with those who prefer to spit in the eye of bullies instead of bending over to be f**ked with out approval and consent. What is life without liberty and a modicum of self-defense (demilitarized without self defense, with no control over airspace, appropriation without consent of territory) but a form of slavery.
AntwortenLöschenI've yet to see the full speech. What you say here is true... best analogy I could think of
AntwortenLöschenIn addition, Netty wont stop the settlements being built. I don't believe a word that came from his mouth and I've never really had much faith in the maturity of Israel as a state. ..
AntwortenLöschenEven if Netty has truly madly deeply become a human being overnight, do you think the Israelis wud allow him to climb into bed beside the Palestinian state? Never.
On top of that, many, most actually, of the current Irish generation "forgive" Britain for her excesses. I'm Irish. I do. And many Irish people I know forgive. But what Israel has done in recent history to the Palestinian people will not be forgiven I feel. ..
AntwortenLöschenPlease! What Netenyahu did was, under pressure from Washington, make a speech where he appeared to offer something but really did not offer anything. There is no way a two state solution will happen in our lifetime. You can't have a civilized democracy sharing land with people who still think it's 580 AD.
AntwortenLöschenI think Israel should take over Gaza and the West Bank and build walls. Islamic majorities have proven they cannot share land with infidels. Israeli women wear tight jeans, drive cars, own businesses, vote and attend college.
A two state solution ends all of that. It's a fight and Israel should act like they are in one!
I would also like to add that I hope everyone is having a super Sunday!
well said and my view also
AntwortenLöschengood reply
AntwortenLöschenThanks Heidi. I worked hard on it. That means a lot!
AntwortenLöschenNot well received:
AntwortenLöschenhttp://www.reuters.com/article/featuredCrisis/idUSLF292103
I think you have forgotten that how people were living in peace before(1857) the invasion of East India Company (British Raj) in Asian Sub-continent.
AntwortenLöschenWhy Palestinian is not allowed to have their own military ? why only Palestine ?
AntwortenLöschenIf you're talking about demilitarisation then it should be for everyone, not for a single party.
They didn't like it? I am shocked, simply shocked. And all because there is no talk of borders, settlements, and the like. Just that the Palestinians will have to give up all means of doing something about it.
AntwortenLöschenThis is solvable provided the borders don't keep moving, and the Palestinians are moved out of refugee camps and into permanent homes. As long as Israel is hedging on this, it isn't going anywhere.
Thanks for the information. I did not know that. Can't help to notice the year 1857 thought. Times have changed.
AntwortenLöschenBut mentality of imperialist powers haven't changed.
AntwortenLöschenBut who are the imperialist powers these days? As in who is trying to build an empire? It isn't the Europeans any more. Russia has been on the opposite tract (the USSR was arguably imperialist, the empire has been shed). The USA, for all its warts really isn't interested in building an empire. It has a long history of putting the local population back in control of their own governments. Which sort of leaves the large multi-national companies, who arguably are imperialistic, and in fact are usually behind the empire building to start with, at least the European version.
AntwortenLöschenYeah we all know who is trying to get to central asia & who wants to divide other countries (referring to Peter Ralph's map). There are some organisation (such as Al-Qaeda) also who wants to dominate but I don't think they can achieve their goals.
AntwortenLöschenis there anything like equality ?
AntwortenLöschenLarge Multi National Companies are interested in Profits. Sometimes at the detriment of a particular society. It is not ideological but solely profit driven.
AntwortenLöschenTrue, but if you look back at say the British Empire, a lot of that was driven by the crown charter companies such as the East India Company http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_East_India_Company
AntwortenLöschenThese actually were the driving force behind the British Empire, though as you said it wasn't ideological, it was profit driven. It doesn't change the damage that was done to India and surrounding areas though.
The analogous situation today is of course the Energy Companies, who don't have an ideology other than profits either, but use their money to buy the political power to get things the way they want them in the countries that have the resources they want.
Money into power, power into money.
Both sides should demiliterize and go back to the original 1945 U.N. agreement tha
AntwortenLöschenI feel that both Palistians and Jews should just go back to the original UNSCOP partition plan and leave it at that. Over 60 years of fighting has been going on in the region. Most people fighting today fight for one reason, "It was what my forefathers fought for" Thier forefathers being long gone.
AntwortenLöschen