Taken from here.
US Ambassador Pressed Pakistani Paper to Pull Column
by Jason Ditz, September 06, 2009
The United States embassy in Pakistan reportedly managed to get the weekly column of a top critic of US policy pulled from the major English-language newspaper in Pakistan “The News International,” following a secret letter from Ambassador Anne Patterson to the newspaper earlier in the week.
The US embassy confirmed sending the letter but would not discuss its content. The newspaper’s editorial team said they were open to publishing the column at a later date, and indeed the article, entitled “Targeting Pakistan and Silencing the Critics” was made available on their website. Still, Pakistani media are saying that the embassy’s ability to block an article it found objectionable from a long-time critic of US policy is a sign of the enormous power the US wields in the nation.
Dr. Shireen Mazari, the author of the article, was interviewed on Iranian state media regarding what she called US censorship, and appeared to be not particularly surprised by the turn of events, though she insisted all the claims she made in the article also appeared in Western media sources, including Deutsche Presse-Agentur. She also vowed to continue her criticism of US policy, insisting “the Americans can’t gag me in my own country.”
Though Ambassador Patterson’s specific objections have not been made public, and she told The News not to publish her letter of complaint, it is widely assumed that Dr. Mazari’s references to Blackwater contractors being used on Pakistani soil was the source of the most vociferous objections.
A member of the opposition Tehreek-e Insaf party, Mazari was the director of a top foreign policy think-tank funded by the Pakistani government, though she was eventually removed from the position after what many in the Pakistani media believe was growing US pressure and warnings from the embassy that so long as she held the position they would treat her comments as official policy.
Following the furore over Dr. Mazari’s column, the Pakistani government officially denied that any Blackwater personnel were in the country, and insisted rules were in place to prevent such a thing happening. The US embassy declined comment, but last month former CIA officials revealed that the company had in fact been providing security on a Pakistani air base from which CIA drones were flown.
September 7, 2009 -- US Ambassador Accuses Pakistan’s Jang Media Group of Endangering Americans
August 21, 2009 -- CIA’s Ties With Blackwater Run Deep
September 24, 2009 -- US Mulls Increasing Drone Strikes in Pakistan
I request moderators to allow this post to be accessed by non multiply users.
AntwortenLöschenI would request that as well.
AntwortenLöschenso what happened to the mantra " Free Speech " - only when it suits.
AntwortenLöschenDr. Shireen Mazari, the author of the article, was interviewed on Iranian state media regarding what she called US censorship, and appeared to be not particularly surprised by the turn of events.
name this article US censors Pakistan media ...
OK, but you know we'll get a load of US right-whingers in here
AntwortenLöschenThey should be told that their government should stop shying away from openly admitting what it's doing in Pakistan and just come clean.
AntwortenLöschenI have this article available for everyone on my site
AntwortenLöschenhttp://jmk2b.multiply.com/journal/item/78
and other Blackwater relating reports are also there..
Blackwater Recruiting Agents Fluent In Urdu & Punjabi For Pakistan
AntwortenLöschenhttp://jmk2b.multiply.com/journal/item/83
US Gets Pakistani Column Pulled Over Blackwater Report
http://jmk2b.multiply.com/journal/item/79/
Why not :)
AntwortenLöschenFreedom of speech and a healthy debate is always welcome..
Reminds us,why we keep fighting.
i HAVE POSTED THIS ELSEWHERE OK ?
AntwortenLöschenWhat's up Jan?
AntwortenLöschenOn this group, you mean? I thought it was familiar...
What's so surprising about political censorship especially in a country like Pakistan? What's so surprising about political interference from other parties who have a self interest? It's already widely known drones are used within Pakistani borders so is it really important as to who is controlling them as long as they are being overseen (sorry I'm droning on here. lol!)
AntwortenLöschenWhat is surprising is that she (the journalist) given a world-wide choice of free media would choose to break the story on Iranian state media and still be seen as a credible source.
Shireen M. Mazari is a scholar and commentator on Strategic Studies and Political Science from Pakistan. She was Director General of Institute of Strategic Studies, a research think-tank based in Islamabad, Pakistan. Reportedly under pressure from the USA, she was removed from this position ahead of the end of her contract in August 2009.
AntwortenLöschenShe is a vocal critic of the United States policies in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Mazari formerly was an Associate Professor and then Chairperson of the Department of Defense and Strategic Studies at the Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.
She received her B.Sc (Honours) from the London School of Economics and Political Science and a Ph.D in Political Science from Columbia University, New York.
Dr.Shireen M. Mazari has played a distinguish role in the Politics and she is considered one the most influential Political Scientist in Pakistan.
She is a regular columnist for daily The News International, Pakistan. However, right now her column is suspended because of what she describes as American pressure. Addressing a news conference, Shirin Mazari said the US poking its nose in all affairs of Pakistan and when she started writing columns on the matter the US Ambassador exerted pressure closing her writings.
Mazari said her life has been under threat adding that the Minister of Interior and US diplomats will be responsible if anything happened to her.
reliable credentials it seems
Hope you didn't mind my semi-duplication. I only saw it on "elephants" and thought it should be widely read.
AntwortenLöschenWell I wouldn't question her academic qualifications but living in Cambridge (UK) I'm not overly impressed by academic achievements or members of "think tanks".
AntwortenLöschenI'd still say "What is surprising is that she (the journalist) given a world-wide choice of free media would choose to break the story on Iranian state media and still be seen as a credible source."
Breaking the story on any state media has to be a conscious choice so I've got to assume that either the independant world press weren't interested or it served her own political agenda to go "public" through a media where even the "public" can't go "public".
I have a question, Can Pakistani Ambassador to US ask State Department to pull out a column from any of the leading newspaper because it's spreading hatred against Pakistan ?
AntwortenLöschenShe is also spokesperson on Foreign Affairs of Imran Khan's political party Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaaf (Movement for Justice Party) or PTI.
AntwortenLöschenShe was the one who break the story of Major General Jay W. Hood appoinment as the Chief, Office of the Defence Representative, Pakistan after that US government was forced to withdraw General Jay Hood appointment due to the public pressure from Pakistan.
AntwortenLöschenI'm not sure what being interviewed on Iranian TV has to do with anyone's credibility. If you want to tell the story, you don't turn down an opportunity.
AntwortenLöschenI doubt there would be official censorship of such a story in the US. This is not an issue of "spreading hatred", but of telling the facts. Most American hate-spreading is done against other Americans anyway, by the Limbaugh types, and they certainly aren't censored.
I think this fits perfectly:
AntwortenLöschenn. pl. bul·lies
1. A person who is habitually cruel or overbearing, especially to smaller or weaker people.
2. A hired ruffian; a thug.
v. bul·lied, bul·ly·ing, bul·lies
v.tr.
1. To treat in an overbearing or intimidating manner.
2. To make (one's way) aggressively.
v.intr.
1. To behave like a bully.
2. To force one's way aggressively or by intimidation