Montag, 27. April 2009

Who Was Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh?

Mohammed Mossadegh

Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh (May 19, 1882 - March 5, 1967) was the democratically elected prime minister of Iran from 1951 to 1953.

(until Operation Ajax by USA & Uk overthrew this democratic leader  in 1953 by a US-organized coup in retaliation for nationalizing oil resources previously controlled by the British.)

I would love to hear the views of Iranians on this subject



Background: Beginning in the 19th Century, Iran becomes subject to interference and land grabs by Britain and Russia. Local dissatisfaction with Iran's weak and corruption prone royal regime grows and becomes increasingly vocal until in August 1906 Shah (King) Muzaffar ad Din is forced to issue a decree promising the introduction of a new constitution. The constitution that is subsequently drafted places strict limitations on royal power and establishes a representative parliament, or Majlis.

http://www.moreorless.au.com/heroes/mossadegh.html

In April Mossadegh is named prime minister. His first act after selecting his Cabinet is to enforce the Oil Nationalisation Bill. Soon after, Iran takes control of the AIOC's refinery at Abadan, which at the time is the largest in the world, supplying 43% of Europe's petroleum requirements.

Britain responds to the nationalisation by placing a worldwide embargo on the purchase of Iranian oil and pressuring its allies to do the same. In September Britain freezes Iran's sterling assets and bans export of goods to Iran.

In the US the administration refuses to lend Iran funds until the dispute is resolved, and works to ensure the oil embargo is enforced.

http://www.angelfire.com/home/iran/

The Iranian people could never forgive the Shah and Pro-Shah activists (Saltanat-Talabs) for the 1953 bloody coup d'état against the Iranian national hero, Dr. Mohammad Mossadegh, the Prime Minister of Iran who was elected by the parliament, the Iranian legend who enforced the Oil Nationalization Bill to terminate the British ownership and influence on the Iran's oil industry in 1951. The 1953 coup d'état was designed by the CIA and fulfilled by the Shah’s military forces and supported by a large number of bribed uneducated hooligans headed by Shaban Jaffari also known as the Shaban-bi-Mokh (the brainless Shaban), organized by the traitors, the pro Shah activists, the Shah’s hand kissers (the Saltanat Talabs) . Thereafter, the Iranian people deeply suffered under the Shah's dictatorship, corruption, phony elections, heavy censorship, torture and execution of thousands of dissenters until the 1979 Revolution.

Dr. Mossadegh remains a figure of tremendous stature in the history of modern Iran. As an individual he had a reputation for honesty, integrity, and sincerity. He strongly opposed British and, later, American influence in Iran. He was an eloquent, impassioned orator, and his speeches are still widely read in Iran.
During Dr. Mossadegh's trial in the Shah's military court, he publicized the secrets of two military coup d'état attempts against his government. He was sentenced to three years imprisonment; thereafter he was transferred to his country house in Ahmad-Abad at the age of 74 and lived there under house arrest until his death. On March 4, 1967, Dr. Mossadegh died of cancer at the age of 84. His body was buried in one of the rooms of his residence.

Today, very few Americans have ever heard of Mohammad Mossadegh, but that wasn’t the case in 1953. At that time, Mossadegh was one of the most famous figures in the world. Here’s the way veteran New York Times correspondent Stephen Kinzer decribes him in his book All the Shah’s Men:

In his time, Mohammad Mossadegh was a titanic figure. He shook an empire and changed the world. People everywhere knew his name. World leaders sought to influence him and later to depose him. No one was surprised when Time magazine chose him over Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, and Winston Churchill as its Man of the Year for 1951.

(Kinzer’s book, published in 2003, is an excellent account of the CIA coup; much of this article is based on his book.)

There were two major problems with Mossadegh, however, as far as both the British and American governments were concerned. First, as an ardent nationalist he was a driving force behind an Iranian attempt to nationalize the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, a British company that had held a monopoly on the production and sale of Iranian oil since the early part of the 20th century. Second, fiercely independent, Mossadegh refused to do the bidding of the U.S. government, which by this time had become fearful that Mossadegh might align Iran with America’s World War II ally and post–World War II enemy, the Soviet Union.


In a speech delivered in March 2000 by Madeleine Albright (then secretary of state ), the U.S. government finally acknowledged what it had done to the Iranian people and to democracy in Iraq:

In 1953, the United States played a significant role in orchestrating the overthrow of Iran’s popular prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh. The Eisenhower administration believed its actions were justified for strategic reasons, but the coup was clearly a setback for Iran’s political development and it is easy to see now why many Iranians continue to resent this intervention by America in their internal affairs. Moreover, during the next quarter century, the United States and the West gave sustained backing to the Shah’s regime. Although it did much to develop the country economically, the Shah’s government also brutally repressed political dissent. As President Clinton has said, the United States must bear its fair share of responsibility for the problems that have arisen in U.S.-Iranian relations.

Not surprisingly, Albright’s “apology” fell on many deaf ears in Iran. While Iranians certainly have not forgotten the U.S. government’s support of Saddam Hussein and Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War during the 1980s, including its furnishing Saddam with weapons of mass destruction to use against the Iranian people, the root of Iranian anger lies with the anti-democracy foreign policy of the U.S. government, by which U.S. officials ousted the Iranian people’s democratically elected prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh, from office in 1953.

http://www.fff.org/comment/com0501i.asp

How the United States Destroyed Democracy in Iran in 1953

http://www.hirhome.com/iraniraq/iran-coup.htm

The overthrow of the nationalist Mosaddeq regime in August 1953 by an American- and British-supported coup changed postwar Iran’s situation in several basic ways, most of which remained important for the quarter century of ensuing dictatorial rule. First, the United States, ...[which already] dominated in military and governmental advice and support, now became the dominant power in Iran. This was reflected in the United States taking a 40 percent share in the oil consortium in 1954.”[5]

So after the 1953 CIA coup, Iranian oil belonged to Britain and the US, not just to Britain. But it still didn’t belong to Iran.


reading list




Freitag, 17. April 2009

The Devil We Know: Dealing with the New Iranian Superpower

Rating:★★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: Biographies & Memoirs
Author:Robert "Bobby" Baer

The Devil We Know: Dealing with the New Iranian Superpower

Yesterday, I was listening to a "Commonwealth Club" radio presentation. The speaker's straightforward views about the Middle East politics struck me. For a first time I was hearing things such as

  • "Israel has lost the the 2006 war against the Hezbollah. No buts or ifs..."[1]

  • "Iran has become a formidable power in the Middle East"

...and all kinds of other "obvious to all, yet hesitant to say it loud" things.

It turned out that he was Robert "Bobby" Baer[2], a former case officer at the Central Intelligence Agency and the author of several books about his experiences in the Middle East giving an introduction to his latest book "The Devil We Know: Dealing with the New Iranian Superpower" [3]

In particular, Baer has documented his experiences in the book See No Evil [4]

I also recalled the movie "Syriana", which had received some Oscars. It turns out that its story was loosely based on Baer's memoirs "See no Evil".

The movie was incredibly impressive regarding its "insight" into the numerous and extremely intriguing facets of the Middle East conflicts. Due to its director's "zeal" to present the audience the full picture, it has become very complex, confusing and hard to follow over its full two hours of running time. Nevertheless, for motivated viewers it does provide a very complete, albeit fuzzy picture of the conflict.

Below are a few more info pointers to him and his works.


[1] Later, I have checked on that:

  • Former defense minister Moshe Arens  said that Israel had lost "to ... 5000 Hezbollah fighters"

  • Ilan Harari, the IDF's chief education officer, stated that Israel lost the war.

  • IDF Major General Yiftah Ron Tal,  [sad] that the IDF failed "to win [...] the battle against Hezbollah" [and] called for Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz' resignation.

  • ...


[2] During his twenty-year CIA career, Baer has publicly acknowledged field assignments in Madras and New Delhi, India; in Beirut, Lebanon; in Dushanbe, Tajikistan;
in Morocco, and in Salah al-Din in Kurdish northern Iraq. During the mid-1990s Baer was sent to Iraq with the mission of organizing opposition to Saddam Hussein but was recalled, and investigated by the FBI, for allegedly conspiring to assassinate the Iraqi leader.[1][2]


While in Salah al-Din, Baer unsuccessfully urged the Clinton Administration to back an internal Iraqi attempt to overthrow Hussein (organized by a group of Sunni military officers, the Iraqi National Congress'Ahmad Chalabi, and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan's Jalal Talabani) in March 1995 with covert CIA assistance. Baer quit the Agency in 1997 and received the CIA'sCareer Intelligence Medal on March 11, 1998. Baer wrote the book See No Evil documenting his experiences while working for the Agency.

Over the years, Baer has become a strong advocate of the Agency's need to increase Human Intelligence (HUMINT) through the recruitment of agents.

In 2004, he told [to a reporter] about the way the CIA deals with terrorism suspects, "If you want them to be tortured, you send them to Syria. If you want someone to disappear—never to see them again—you send them to Egypt."


[3] "The Devil We Know: Dealing with the New Iranian Superpower"The Devil We Know

Former CIA operative Baer challenges the conventional wisdom regarding Iran in this timely and provocative analysis, arguing that Iran has already half-won its undeclared 30-year war with the United States and is rapidly becoming a superpower. In Baer's analysis, Iran has succeeded by using carefully vetted proxies such as Hezbollah and by appealing across the Muslim sectarian divide to Sunni Arabs, and is well on its way to establishing an empire in the Persian Gulf. Baer claims that since Iran's dominance in the Middle East is a fait accompli, the United States has no viable choice but to ask for a truce and enter into negotiations prepared to drop sanctions against Iran and accept a partition of Iraq, which is already, and irretrievably, lost. Baer's assumptions are often questionable—most tellingly that Iran is now trustworthy—and his conclusions premature: he states unequivocally, for example, that the Iranians have annexed the entire south [of Iraq]. But his brief adds an important perspective to a crucial international debate. (From Publishers Weekly)

Note: I was so surprised, because these have been almost exactly my views on the issue!
Darn! Should have joined the Company after graduation!
Either that, or, undoubtedly being super-smart, he guessed well what the current readerswant to hear.
...Once with the Company, always with the Company!


[4] "See No Evil: The True Story of a Ground Soldier in the CIA's War on Terrorism"

is a 2003 memoir by Robert Baer, a former CIA case officer in the Directorate of Operations. Approximately the first two-thirds of the memoir focus on the various experiences of Baer's two-decade career at the CIA, while the last third depicts the obliviousness encountered in Washington.

Some focal points are

  • the unsolved 1983 United States Embassy bombing in Beirut, Lebanon.
  • the involvement of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard in the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing (a death toll of over 300), and in other terrorist operations.
  • the damage done to the CIA by the catastrophic treason of CIA agent Aldrich Ames, and the CIA's failure to identify the mole.
  • his experience with oil politics in Washington and the extended reach granted to oil's agenda by the politically-fixated and strategically oblivious American government.

The film Syriana (2005) was loosely based on this book.

List of his books:

Montag, 13. April 2009

9-11 Solved, says Former Italian President

I was reminded of this article from December 2007 today...Thanks J... can't believe this hasn't been put on this group already.  One of the most essential testimonies on the topic that we have. 
 
 

ITALIAN SAYS 9-11 SOLVED

 

It’s common knowledge, he reveals, CIA, Mossad behind terror attacks

 

By the Staff of American Free Press

 

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, has told Italy’s oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad, and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies. In what translates awkwardly into English, Cossiga told the newspaper Corriere della Sera:

"All the [intelligence services] of America and Europe…know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part … in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."

Cossiga was elected president of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide election to become president of the country in 1985, and he remained until 1992.

Cossiga’s tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment, and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio. This was a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 1960s, 1970s and ’80s. Gladio’s specialty was to carry out what they termed "false flag" operations—terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition.

In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force … the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9-11 in 2001, and is quoted by 9-11 researcherWebster Tarpley saying "The mastermind of the attack must have been a sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel."

Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga’s assertion that the 9-11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge among global intelligence agencies is illuminating. It is one more eye-opening confirmation that has not been mentioned by America’s propaganda machine in print or on TV. Nevertheless, because of his experience and status in the world, Cossiga cannot be discounted as a crackpot.

 

(Issue #52, December 24, 2007)

 

I doubt we'll ever know the full truth about that tragic day, much like the JFK assassination... I'm not sure I believe 100% it was 'an inside job', but I think somebody knew it was coming, exactly who I'm uncertain... almost certainly Cheney, probably Larry Silverstein, we could speculate all day... one of the strongest arguments against prior knowledge is that 'too many people would have to know'.  So those who did are likely to be few.  And they're probably very happy to keep things that way.  I believe the attack was carried out by extremist Jihadists, but who paid for it and who knew, who was complicit are really, much more important... a money trail that is sure to have had vital links in the chain erased long ago.  What I 'believe' is immaterial anyway, when you have the testimony of a former head of state.

Related:

Timeline: ignored intelligence warnings

Who Knew?

'Hijacker' still alive

Insurance and ownership of WTC

Philip Zelikow

Bin Laden met CIA in Dubai, summer 2001

Was Mohammed Atta a double agent?

Peter Dale Scott - various articles (see Far West Ltd, drugs and 9-11)

 

Also noteworthy:

Operation Gladio

The Fifth Column

Propaganda Masonica Due

 

Mittwoch, 8. April 2009

Ministry of Defence, Insider Trading and The World Central Bank?

It is referred to by some as 'The World Central Bank' , 'The Central Bank for Central Banks' and so on. Why is it that after a rudimentary search on www.DnB.com and Google can we easily connect the United Kingdom (corporation) Ministry of Defence to the Bank for International Settlements?

The DnB.com search:

A 2 second Google search reveals...

B I S - The Bank for International Settlements

So.. the MOD is trading as the 'Central Bank for Central Banks'. What is going on here?!

For the moment the question is wide open. You can read more about the BIS here and here, and many more sources through Google.

 

Do some research and help TPUC blow the lid off this!

Footnote:

The sharper eyed out there may also have noticed the DnB search ' B I S LTD '  result which leads on to the Baltic Exchange: read about it here.  The Baltic Exchange started life on Threadneedle Street in 1744 - and is also where the Bank of England (Private Corporation) is also now Headquartered and is 'affectionately' known as 'The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street'. 

http://tpuc.org/content/ministry-defence-company-also-traded-b-i-s-could-be-bank-international-settlements

Dienstag, 7. April 2009

Global Catastrophes and Trends - The next 50 years

Rating:★★★★
Category:Books
Genre: Other
Author:Vaclav Smil
Fundamental change occurs most often in one of two ways: as a "fatal discontinuity," a sudden catastrophic event that is potentially world changing, or as a persistent, gradual trend. Global catastrophes include volcanic eruptions, viral pandemics, wars, and large-scale terrorist attacks; trends are demographic, environmental, economic, and political shifts that unfold over time. In this provocative book, scientist Vaclav Smil takes a wide-ranging, interdisciplinary look at the catastrophes and trends the next fifty years may bring. This is not a book of forecasts or scenarios but one that reminds us to pay attention to, and plan for, the consequences of apparently unpredictable events and the ultimate direction of long-term trends.
Smil first looks at rare but cataclysmic events, both natural and human-produced, then at trends of global importance: the transition from fossil fuels to other energy sources; demographic and political shifts in Europe, Japan, Russia, China, the United States, and Islamic nations; the battle for global primacy; and growing economic and social inequality. He also considers environmental change—in some ways an amalgam of sudden discontinuities and gradual change—and assesses the often misunderstood complexities of global warming.
Global Catastrophes and Trends does not come down on the side of either doom-and-gloom scenarios or techno-euphoria. Instead, relying on long-term historical perspectives and a distaste for the rigid compartmentalization of knowledge, Smil argues that understanding change will help us reverse negative trends and minimize the risk of catastrophe.
LINKS FOR DOWNLOAD:
http://uploading.com/files/82KJAUHI/0262195860.zip.html
or
http://depositfiles.com/en/files/ydp6pwi7f

Freitag, 3. April 2009

Oil-Rich Arab State Pushes Nuclear Bid With U.S. Help - WSJ.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123862439816779973.html

Oil-Rich Arab State Pushes Nuclear Bid With U.S. Help

ABU DHABI -- The mating of the words "nuclear" and "Persian Gulf" normally sets off alarm bells in Washington. Yet this oil-rich Arab state just across the gulf from Iran is on a crash course to develop nuclear power with U.S. backing.

Dozens of American engineers, lawyers and businessmen have converged on Abu Dhabi in recent months to help the United Arab Emirates get the Arab world's first nuclear-power program running by 2017. "I don't know anyone else who has rolled out a nuclear program of this magnitude this fast," says Jeffrey Benjamin, an American engineer who in October was named project manager for Emirates Nuclear Energy Corp., which oversees Abu Dhabi's nuclear program.

Even as the U.S. remains determined to block Iran from developing nuclear weapons, President Barack Obama sees the U.A.E. program as a "model for the world," according to a senior White House official, and by mid-April could move to present a bilateral nuclear-cooperation treaty to Congress for approval. The ability to make electricity through nuclear power is a long way from the ability to build weapons -- and, proponents say, the agreement could make bomb-making harder.

The treaty, signed by former President George W. Bush during his last week in office, would allow American firms to engage in nuclear trade with the U.A.E. To build support, the U.A.E. is agreeing to buy approved nuclear fuel on the international market, rather than enriching uranium or reprocessing plutonium, both of which can be made into weapons-grade material. It will also open its facilities to random international inspections.


The U.A.E.'s push represents a test for nuclear-power advocates who want countries across the globe to go nuclear -- so long as they play by the rules. The U.S. and United Nations officials are championing the U.A.E. as a role model for other developing countries and as a counterexample to Iran. Tehran has repeatedly rebuffed international inspectors, while amassing large quantities of materials that can be used to build bombs. A spokesman at the Iranian mission to the U.N. says Iran's nuclear program is purely for civilian purposes, and says Tehran believes "peaceful nuclear programs" are the right of all signatures to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

[Arab Summit]

 Reuters

Qatari Emir Sheik Hamad bin Khalifa al Thani, right, receives United Arab Emirates President Sheik Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan at Doha international airport on Sunday. Leaders of the 22-member Arab League gathered in the Gulf Arab state of Qatar for a two-day summit meeting.

Some U.S. lawmakers have threatened to block the U.A.E. deal, saying the risks of letting that country split the atom are too large. They cite the U.A.E.'s history as a transit point for sensitive military technologies to Iran, Iraq and Libya. They also make the slippery-slope argument: If one Arab country has nuclear power, others may pile in, and perhaps down the road, seek nuclear weapons as well. Both Saudi Arabia and Egypt have recently announced their desire to develop nuclear-power programs with U.S. assistance.

Western and Asian companies are already salivating at the chance for lucrative contracts with the U.A.E., which has set the end of April as the rough deadline for bids. General Electric Co. and Westinghouse Electric Co. are among the U.S. firms interested in the initial $20 billion in reactor work, say officials familiar with the bidding process. GE and Westinghouse declined to comment.

Facing ambitious timelines set by officials bent on growth, Mr. Benjamin, the American engineer, and his colleagues rarely get far from the Emirates Nuclear Energy headquarters in downtown Abu Dhabi. Many live in an apartment building next to the office and exercise at the same gym. Mr. Benjamin lives three floors above his office.

Surge in Demand

The U.A.E. began exploring nuclear power three years ago as it faced a surge in electricity demand, say Emirati officials. The Persian Gulf country is a federation of seven states, among them Abu Dhabi, the capital, and Dubai. It has among the largest oil reserves in the world. But it's short of the natural gas that is used to fuel power and water-desalination plants, and imports most of its gas from neighboring Qatar.

Abu Dhabi's ruler, Sheik Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan, commissioned a white paper that concluded the country's electricity demand would reach 40,000 megawatts by 2020 from around 16,000 megawatts currently. Nonnuclear options, such as coal-fired plants, solar energy or alternative fuels, were seen either as insufficient to meet demand, too expensive or harmful to the environment.

"Nuclear power was seen both as practical and clean," says Hussain al Nowais, an Abu Dhabi industrialist who took part in the study.



Mittwoch, 1. April 2009

G20 Protest




Mostly taken from MSN. The event turned nasty today, it has been reported (and predicted). I'll have a proper scout for some more photography in the coming days.


http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx?cp-documentid=15605725

Mob vandalises bank in G20 protests

Masked anarchists have stormed a branch of the Royal Bank of Scotland in the City of London as the G20 protests turned violent.

More than 4,000 demonstrators, most of them peaceful, gathered near the Bank of England to demand action from world leaders. But several hundred clashed with police, who were pelted with eggs, paint bombs and empty beer cans.

Scotland Yard responded by cordoning off streets and sending in riot police and officers on horseback. There were 19 arrests for offences such as violent disorder, threatening behaviour and breach of the peace.

The day began with marches from Cannon Street, Liverpool Street, Moorgate and London Bridge, led by effigies of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.

As the lines of protesters walked peacefully towards the Bank of England, City workers were seen waving £10 notes at them from office windows above.

Political protesters carrying banners marked "Balls to the Banks" and "Punish the looters" were joined by workers who had lost their jobs in the recession.

When the four processions converged on the roads around the Bank at around midday, the atmosphere turned menacing.

Police closed off nearby streets to stop anyone leaving the area as small groups of protesters began charging police lines.

To cheers from parts of the crowd, a handful of men with black scarves obscuring their faces and hoods over their heads smashed a hole in the windows with a metal pole and crawled in.

Police entered the branch at around 2pm and shortly afterwards began driving demonstrators away from the building. An RBS spokeswoman said the branch was closed on Wednesday and there was no-one inside.